Department of Pacific Affairs · ANU College of Asia and the Pacific
Conflicts over natural resources are an enduring feature of social and political life at different scales and levels of organisation. The inter-state and geopolitical dimensions of conflicts over resources such as oil and water and marine resources loom large in the popular imaginary. Resource conflicts in the Asia-Pacific are predominantly intra-state, fought internally, within the boundaries of the nation-state, but often involving claims to various forms of ‘internal’ self-determination or secession (‘external’ self-determination). According to the United Nations, at least 40 per cent of internal conflicts globally are related to natural resources. Examining such conflicts in the Asia-Pacific region is the focus of this course. A striking conundrum lies at the heart of the inquiry: rather than contributing to peace and prosperity, empirical research demonstrates that natural resource wealth increases the likelihood of countries experiencing internal violent conflict. How and why is this the case? Is resource scarcity a driver of violent conflict in such contexts? What policy responses and interventions are available, and where secessionist demands become a factor, what solutions are available in terms of decentralisation or either ‘internal’ or ‘external’ self-determination? How might natural resource wealth contribute to peace rather than to conflict? What roles do political and economic contestation play in conflicts over land, sea, and natural resources? The course will be structured around a series of case studies drawn from Asia and the Pacific. In terms of theory, first, a political ecology framework will be applied to the analysis of differing natural resource conflicts, and second, a political/legal lens will aid analysis of ways that decentralisation or self-determination may prevent or resolve such conflict. Alongside these case studies, students will undertake their own analysis of a natural resource conflict in which they will be attentive to the role of different actors - especially the state, communities (including secessionist movements), and corporations - and to questions of scale, power and identity. The course will apply a research-led approach to teaching and learning. In addition to core expertise housed in the Department of Pacific Affairs (ANU), it draws upon expertise from other parts of the ANU. Such scholars will be involved in class room teaching, and course assessment will enable engagement with them in innovative ways.
Participation
Learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Critical analysis of course themes (800 words)
Learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Minor Essay (1200 words)
Learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Research Essay (2000 words)
Learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
This course comprises some 130 hours of activity over 12 weeks, including some 24 hours of lectures or an equivalent activity and some 12 hours of tutorials or equivalent activity. The course comprises a maximum of 6000 words of assessment or the equivalent.
Peluso, N.L. and Watts, M. (eds.). 2001. Violent Environments. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. Lujala, P. and S.A. Rustad. (eds). 2012. High-Value Natural Resources and Peacebuilding, London: Earthscan. Hall, D, Hirsch, P. and Li, T. 2011. Powers of Exclusion: Land Dilemmas in Southeast Asia. National University of Singapore Press, Singapore. Ballentine, K. and Sherman, J. Eds. 2003. The Political Economy of Armed Conflict: Beyond Greed and Grievance. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner. Preliminary Reading Allen, M.G. Melanesia’s Violent Environments: towards a political ecology of conflict in the western Pacific. 2013. Geoforum 44:152-161. Auty, R.M. 1993. Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: the Resource-Curse Thesis. Routledge, London. Ballard, C. and Banks, G. 2003. Resource Wars: the anthropology of mining. Annual Review of Anthropology 32:287-313. Ballentine, K. and Sherman, J. Eds. 2003. The Political Economy of Armed Conflict: Beyond Greed and Grievance. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner. Banks, G. 2008. Understanding ‘resource conflicts’ in Papua New Guinea. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 49(1):23-34. Bannon, I. & Collier, P, (eds.) 2003, Natural resources and violent conflict: Options and actions, The World Bank, Washington. Bruch C, Jensen D, Nakayama M, Unruh J, Gruby R, Wolfarth R. 2008. Post-Conflict Peace Building and Natural Resources. Yearbook of International Environmental Law 19(1): 58-96. DOI: 10.1093/yiel/19.1.58 Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A. 2004. Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers, 56:563-595. Cramer, C. 2002. Homo Economicus Goes to War: Methodological Individualism, Rational Choice and the Political Economy of War. World Development, 30(11):1845-1864. Elmhirst, R. 2001. Resource struggles and the politics of place in North Lampung, Indonesia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 22(3):284-306. Filer, C. 1997. Compensation, Rent and Power in Papua New Guinea. In S. Toft (ed.), Compensation for Resource Development in Papua New Guinea. The Australian National University, Canberra, pp. 157-189. Hall, D, Hirsch, P. and Li, T. Powers of Exclusion: Land Dilemmas in Southeast Asia. National University of Singapore Press, Singapore. Homer-Dixon, T.F. 1999. Environment, Scarcity and Violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Koczberski, G. and Curry, G.N. 2004. Divided communities and contested landscapes: Mobility, development and shifting identities in migrant destination sites in Papua New Guinea. Asia Pacific Viewpoin