coursemapLoading course
ANU College of Asia and the Pacific
Advanced Studies Courses in the Social Sciences and Humanities 1 (BPHB1114) provides students with an opportunity to conduct an in-depth review of the literature on a topic of their interest in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Students develop their research paper along with a select cohort of peers. Each student receives close guidance from the program convenor and professional academic skills advisers as well as structured peer input; students also learn to formulate and provide constructive criticism of others’ work and to edit their own work. This systematic approach helps to appropriately frame the research questions, define the literature to be reviewed, and structure the paper. As the first of a staged series of Advanced Studies Courses (ASCs) in the Bachelor of Philosophy (Honours)—Humanities and Social Sciences, BPHB1114 will help to provide a foundation to independent research with guidance from an academic supervisor—the subsequent ASCs, BPHB2114 and BPHB3114. BPHB-coded courses are open only to students enrolled in the Bachelor of Philosophy (Honours)—Humanities and Social Sciences. Program Context The Bachelor of Philosophy (Honours)—Humanities and Social Sciences, or PhB (HaSS), is a unique and innovative research-focused undergraduate degree for intellectually ambitious students who want to study at the highest level. Every student receives intensive individual attention and is supported by specialist academic mentors. The program structure is extremely flexible and courses can be taken from all areas of the University. Guided and advised by your academic mentors, you will help tailor and structure progression through the degree to suit your interests and desired outcomes. Students do 36 units of ASCs during the PhB (HaSS) degree, each specifically designed to provide a strong research focus customised to each student and a stepping stone to the next level of independence and depth. Students personally select and work closely with a dedicated academic supervisor in a particular discipline or field of study to undertake ASCs. Learning activities and assessment are creatively devised to build transferable skills or achieve specific research outcomes, and may, for example, include: - Guided primary data collection, analysis, and presentation - Specially designed courses of fieldwork - Mass media production, for example web page development or Op-Ed contributions - Involvement in outreach activities - Policy paper drafting and presentations to relevant Australian Government Departments or Units - Seminars to staff and students - Reading courses/ literature surveys - Involvement in current research at the University
Assessment will be based on a literature review paper of 4500 words, including notes but not including bibliography, plus a presentation of findings to peers and academic supervisors. The disciplinary area and topic of the review will be decided by the student and PhB convenor in consultation.
Learning outcomes 1, 2, 3, 5, 6
Active participation in unstructured in-class discussion is expected and constitutes 10% of the final grade.
Learning outcomes 3, 6
Active participation in structured prompting and peer feedback, both online and in face-to-face group work, is expected and constitutes 10% of the final grade.
Learning outcomes 3, 4, 6
This course requires a total of 130 hours of work on the following activities: 36 hours of contact over 12 weeks and 94 hours of independent student research, reading and writing. Other Information This course is a guided Literature Review course run with all first year PhB students
Textbook #1: Efron (2018). Efron, Sara Efrat, and Ruth Ravid. 2019. Writing the Literature Review: A Practical Guide. New York: Guilford Press. https://anu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61ANU_INST/1b9evlp/alma991002065819707631 Textbook #2: Mullaney & Rea (2022). Mullaney, Thomas S., and Christopher G. Rea. 2022. Where Research Begins: Choosing a Research Project That Matters to You (and the World). Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing. Chicago, Illinois. The University of Chicago Press. https://anu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/61ANU_INST/auraal/alma991026996442507631 Preliminary Reading ANU. 2021. 'Key Ethical Concerns: Human Research Ethics Committee', Accessed December 13. https://services.anu.edu.au/research-support/ethics-integrity/key-ethical-concerns. Braudel, Fernand. 2009 [1958]. 'History and the Social Sciences: the Longue Duree', Review, XXXII 171-203. Dietz, Thomas, Rachael L. Shwom, and Cameron T. Whitley. 2020. 'Climate Change and Society', Annual Review of Sociology, 46: 135-58. Dooly, Melinda, Emilee Moore, and Claudia Vallejo. 2017. 'Research Ethics.' in Melinda Dooly, Emilee Moore and Claudia Vallejo (eds.), Qualitative Approaches to Research on Plurilingual Education (Research-publishing.net). Efron, Sara Efrat, and Ruth Ravid. 2019. Writing the literature review: A practical guide (Guilford Press: New York). George, Alexander, and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (MIT Press: Cambridge). Klinenberg, Eric, Malcolm Araos, and Liz Koslov. 2020. 'Sociology and the Climate Crisis', Annual Review of Sociology, 46: 649-69. Lawrence, Roderick J. 2015. 'Advances in transdisciplinarity: Epistemologies, methodologies and processes', Futures, 65 Le Guin, Ursula. 1973. The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas (https://www.worldcat.org/title/ones-who-walk-away-from-omelas/oclc/25282554/editions?referer=di&editionsView=true). Mullaney, Thomas S., and Christopher G. Rea. 2022. Where research begins : choosing a research project that matters to you (and the world) (The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Illinois ;). Randolph, Justus. 2009. 'A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review', Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14: 13. Smith, Deborah. 2003. 'Five Principles for Research Ethics: Cover Your Bases with These Ethical Strategies', Monitor: The American Psychological Association, 34: 56. Stember, Marilyn. 1991. 'Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise', The Social Science Journal, 28: 1-14.